RESUMEN
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a viral respiratory illness caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Since its first appearance in December 2019, COVID-19 has been responsible for a number of global outbreaks and has claimed the lives of nearly three million people as of April 2021. High infection rate, loss of taste and smell, fever, cough, and severely adverse effects on the respiratory system have been the chief attributes of the virus. However, SARS-CoV-2 has been linked to other symptoms, many of which are extra-pulmonary or not directly related to the respiratory system. The impact of SARS-CoV-2 on various ophthalmic outcomes has been manifested in many reports and literature tracing the link between COVID-19 and ocular findings in patients suffering from COVID-19. One recurrent case report presented in the literature is related to the presentation of conjunctivitis in COVID-19 patients. Conjunctivitis is a viral infection causing inflammation in conjunctiva, episclera and eyelids resulting in a change of color in eyes, called pink eyes. Swelling, itching, pain, and eye burn are some of the common symptoms. The present study reviews the latest literature on the subject by focusing on the reports of conjunctivitis symptoms in patients with COVID-19. © 2022 The Author(s).
RESUMEN
Background: Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who develop cardiopulmonary arrest often have poor prognosis, prompting discussions with families about goals of care. The relationship between clinical and social determinants of code status change is poorly understood. Methods: This retrospective study included adult COVID-19 positive patients admitted to the intensive care unit with cardiac arrest in a multihospital center over the first 9 months of the pandemic (3/1/2020-12/1/2020). Data on medical and social factors was collected and adjudicated. Results: We identified 208 patients over the study timeline. The mean age was 63.7 ± 14.5 years and 54.3% (n=113) were male. The majority of patients with cardiopulmonary arrest had pulseless electrical activity (PEA) as their initial rhythm (91.3%, n=190). Code status was changed in 56.3% (n=117) of patients. The majority of COVID-19 patients with cardiac arrest were Hispanic (53.4%, n=111), followed by African American (27.9%, n=58), and White patients (13.5%, n=28). Race/ethnicity did not affect the rate of code status change. COVID-19 patients who had a code status change were statistically more likely to have a lower salary ($54,838 vs $62,374), have a history of stroke/transient ischemic attack (15.4 vs 4.4%, 18:4), or heart failure (28.2 vs 15.6%, 33:14), all with P<0.05. Patients with code status change had shorter courses of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (11.9 vs 16.9 minutes, P<0.05). Both groups had similar levels of aggressive care received including continuous renal replacement therapy, vasopressor and broad-spectrum antibiotics requirements. Insurance status, ethnicity, religion, and education did not lead to statistically significant changes in code status in COVID patients. Conclusion: Patients hospitalized with cardiopulmonary arrest and positive for COVID-19 are more likely to have a change in code status. This code status change is affected by cardiovascular comorbidities such as stroke and heart failure, along with lower income but not by insurance status, ethnicity, religion, and educational level.
RESUMEN
Background. As the COVID-19 pandemic has exhausted the healthcare system and economic infrastructures, controlling measures are directed toward population-based strategies including individual's hygiene and safe socializing. We conducted this study to identify individual's factors at the population level which are associated with the risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 in a middle-to-low income country. Methods. A prospective case-control study was conducted to compare the demographics, socioeconomics, and individual's behavior between patients with COVID-19 and randomly selected healthy controls from the same population referring to a general hospital in northwest Iran. Results. Data of 250 patients with a positive RT-PCR test for COVID-19 was compared with 250 healthy controls between March 1st and May 15th (Table1). Higher education, better socioeconomic status, having access to the internet or following relevant news, having an obsession for cleanliness especially regular hands washing with alcohol-based disinfectants, wearing masks in public especially those with an N-95 filter, complying with stay-home orders, and receiving the flu shot over the past season were protective against contracting COVID-19. On the contrary, cigarette smoking or opium consumption, a history of recent travel, having an individual with infection with SARS-CoV-2 within the household, and recent hospitalization were associated with COVID-19. Table1. Comparison of individual's factors between COVID-19 positive and negative patients Conclusion: Individuals' characteristics at a family or public level can guide healthcare authorities and lawmakers in their ongoing endeavors toward controlling the COVID-19 pandemics, especially in low-to-middle income regions.